|

|

|

THE IDEOLOGICAL CIVIL WAR BITCOIN REFUSES TO ACKNOWLEDGE

In June 2025, Bitcoin Core developers made a declaration:

"We are not censors. Bitcoin must remain technically neutral."

That single line tore the community apart. By lifting the 10-year cap on OP_RETURN, they allowed JPEGs, AI novels, spam .zips, even audio logs on-chain.

🖼️ Mempools flooded
💸 JPEGs reigned
⚔️ Maxis snapped

Bitcoin JPEG Wars is not a game. It's a fork risk protocol.

A decentralized simulation of the ideological civil war Bitcoin refuses to acknowledge.

Bitcoin JPEG Wars - The Ideological Split

>>> YOU NOW CHOOSE A SIDE

Choose Your Side: Tech-Neutralists vs Purist Hardliners

>>> Choose your side. This is not a game. This is a fork risk protocol.

>>> CURRENT BATTLEFIELD

Bitcoin JPEG Inscription Referendum

ACTIVE WARJPEG-WAR-001

Should Bitcoin allow unlimited JPEG inscriptions via OP_RETURN?

This vote will determine the future of Bitcoin's data storage capabilities and whether it remains primarily sound money or becomes a general-purpose data layer.

Cryptographic Voting Interface
FORK RISK PROTOCOL
YES🔵
Let the chain be free

Support unlimited JPEG inscriptions on Bitcoin. Users should be free to inscribe any data if they pay the network fees. Code is law.

• Unrestricted OP_RETURN usage• Market-driven fee mechanism• Technical neutrality maintained
NO🔴
Purge the junk

Limit JPEG inscriptions to preserve Bitcoin's primary function as sound money and prevent blockchain bloat from spam.

• Enforce data size limits• Prioritize monetary transactions• Preserve Bitcoin's purpose
Bitcoin JPEG Wars - Tech-Neutralists vs Purist Hardliners
59%
41%
TECH-NEUTRALISTS592 VOTES
FORK RISK: HIGH
PURIST HARDLINERS407 VOTES

>>> PROTOCOL.TXT

Bitcoin JPEG Wars is not a game. It's a fork risk protocol.
Powered by Node Wars — an on-chain voting battlefield deployed on Solana.
We simulate civil wars. We measure consensus. We predict forks.